![]() ![]() There is always one exception that proves the rule, though, and in this case it was LinkedIn. Looking at Facebook, Zynga, Pandora, Trulia, Zynga and Yelp, the answer was, for the most part, that they were not. In a recent piece I wrote, I looked at a number of companies that had gone public in 20, to see if those stocks were rebounding. “That said, we continue to believe LinkedIn and its network is one of the most valuable assets in Internet with significant potential for accelerating user growth and monetization,” the analysts wrote.Analysts remain bullish on stock, placing price targets around $200 Goldman Sachs analysts reiterated a buy rating but lowered the price target to $200 from $280, saying that despite the weaker than expected outlook, the stock’s declining price as well as expected growth in the company’s recruiter product makes it a valuable holding.“We understand the rationale (and this possibility had been telegraphed by ), but these two largely self-inflicted moves will likely overshadow the still healthy/encouraging trends in the business and outlook,” the analysts wrote. That said, the analysts said the outlook and killing off the lead accelerator will be the prominent story for investors. The analysts said LinkedIn’s fourth-quarter earnings show that the company has a solid core business. Macquarie Research analysts lowered the price target to $225 from $260 but reaffirmed a buy rating. ![]() Credit Suisse analysts lowered LinkedIn’s price target to $230 from $330, but maintained an outperform rating based on LinkedIn’s growth in corporate customers - which has more than 43,000 customers - the potential to increase prices for the company’s sponsored updates channel and use of ad-targeting in the future.“Our thesis was predicated on increasing SaaS-based components of the business supplying greater earnings visibility, diminishing contribution from volatile segments like premium display, and being home to a platform well conducive to native mobile advertising,” the analysts wrote. Monness, Crespi & Hardt downgraded LinkedIn to neutral from buy, saying that the company’s outlook, which includes headwinds for the company’s hiring business, doesn’t fit with their thesis. The analysts were concerned about the deceleration in Talent Solutions in 2015 and the guidance, which expects a deceleration of about 25% in that segment 2016 in addition to headwinds and the phasing out of the lead accelerator product. Morgan downgraded LinkedIn to neutral from overweight and cut the price target to $186 from $300. Ugh,” the analysts wrote.īut, they added that they believe the stock reaction is “overdone.” “Now Sales Navigator really is LinkedIn’s only big near-term opportunity to materially increase the monetization of its data set. They called exiting Bizo a “gigantic mistake” and said the company will have to spend the rest of the year restoring investor confidence in the company.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |